皇马vs塞尔塔全场数据：射门数19-6，但解围数3-30（皇马战塞尔塔数据对比：射门19比6，解围仅3比30）

Interpreting match stats

I need to respond to the user, who wrote in Chinese about the match stats between Real Madrid and Celta. They mentioned shots and clearances, which seems to imply they're looking for some analysis or insight. I should ask a clarifying question and provide an interpretation. It looks like Real Madrid dominated in shots, but Celta had many clearances, suggesting they were on the back foot defensively. I could also think about mentioning other match aspects like possession and corners, but I can't fetch additional details right now.Analyzing match stats

The user is pointing out match stats, so I’ll provide a concise analysis. Celta's high clearances suggest low possession and defensive pressure. However, clearances can be influenced by game style, like a focus on aerial balls. Real Madrid's 3 clearances indicate they faced fewer threats from Celta. The 19-6 shot ratio aligns with that. Clearances also correlate with shot-blocking, meaning Celta's defense was effective in keeping shots down to 19. It’s possible that many of those were crosses or direct attacks. I shouldn't speculate too much about scenarios though.Stat interpretation

I can explain that a team may have few tackles or interceptions, yet many clearances due to facing numerous deliveries. It's essential to note that shots and clearances are different metrics. I should also consider additional metrics like possession percentage, field tilt, attempted and successful crosses, corners, touches in the box, and passes into the final third. High clearances don't necessarily indicate good defense; they may show that the team was under pressure. I should offer to pull a more detailed breakdown if the user provides context or preferences.Clarifying clearances

I should explain that clearances happen before shot events. A heavy focus on crossing leads to more clearances, while Real Madrid's low clearance count suggests they dominated territorially. To validate this, I can check metrics like crosses, corners, box touches, possession, and field tilt. Celta may have cleared under pressure instead of building play. I should ask if the user wants a quick visualization, a deeper analysis, or a comparison to league averages. Clearances typically range from 10-20, so 30 is very high, while 3 is low. Shots of 19 is also high, which is helpful!

大体意思：并不矛盾，反而互相印证。

• 19-6 射门说明皇马长时间压制进攻；3-30 解围则说明塞尔塔被长时间压在本方禁区/三分之一区，不断把来球先行破坏。
• 解围与射门不是同一事件链：大量传中、二点球、斜长传、角球都会先触发“解围”，只有解围失败或二次进攻才更可能形成“射门”。所以能看到“解围远多于被射门”。
• 皇马只有 3 次解围，多半因为防线前提、控球与场面优势，让他们很少在本禁区被迫清球。
• 30 次解围对单场来说非常高（常见区间约 10–20），3 次非常低；19 脚射门偏高且与这种解围分布一致。
• 可能的风格/赛况因素：皇马高位压迫+大量传中/定位球堆积解围；塞尔塔在领先劣势或体能因素下更倾向“先解为主”而非从后场出球。

想更精确判断攻防态势，可以再看这些指标：

• 传中次数/成功率、角球数、禁区触球、三分之二进攻停留时间（field tilt）
• xG 与被封堵射门数（被封堵多也常伴随高解围）
• 传入禁区/危险区域的次数（deep completions）

需要我按这场的更完整技术统计做个小结或画个简表吗？